tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16801508.post5458474868957058816..comments2024-02-26T01:23:43.923-06:00Comments on Loretta Nall: Webster Alexander facing 41 yearsLoretta Nallhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10598106614871958352noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16801508.post-17823142618325411362011-01-27T07:39:05.392-06:002011-01-27T07:39:05.392-06:00Hey, I am checking this blog using the phone and t...Hey, I am checking this blog using the phone and this appears to be kind of odd. Thought you'd wish to know. This is a great write-up nevertheless, did not mess that up.<br /><br />- DavidAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16801508.post-52821568733889697932011-01-23T10:29:56.551-06:002011-01-23T10:29:56.551-06:00I lived in a town in Northern Alabama. You are cor...I lived in a town in Northern Alabama. You are correct that the laws within the state are backwards-hell,look at the state constitution. For the man involved with this case, I feel ashamed that the law would do such a thing: and its not the first time. In 2008 I went to watch a court case in Blount County- the man was being charged with trafficking of narcotics while he was driving back to college in Huntsville. The police could not prove that it was his drugs(and his fingerprints never came up on the bag when tested). He was a quited, but it was a shame that the law enforcement failed to provide any sort of evidence or proof before drawing a conclusion on the man's conviction. It seems to me that this is the common way law enforcement agencies in rural areas and small towns operate: judgment and predigest without any legal backing evidence. Sounds like what happened to this kid-although I wonder if a constitutional argument can be made: do police and other law enforcement agencies have the right to harass someone and charge them on ridiculous charges for ridiculous amounts of time? And the answer is simple: no.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com